HMMM...THE LIST IS GROWING...PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HENRY BEASLEY - ADDED TO THE LIST.UPDATED AS OF JUNE 10, 2016

Libel is any Defamation which can be seen, such as a writing, printing, effigy, movie, or statue. 

Click images for zoom...

Not sure how many views he gets these days but the most recent number I found was 6178,  from a 7 day period in February 24, 2013. Margulies' Blog incites the public, the community and Trimet employees against his victims or targets.

btw, I've never met her!

Captured from a Union FB site which shows 773 ATU members/co-workers, as of May 19, 2015

As of May 24th, 2015  - 3 DIFFERENT  people - 3 IDENTICAL comments!  

"QUEEN OF CRAZY"

1.) Rantings Blog - 6178 as of 2/24/13.

2.) ATU 757 specific FB Blog - 773 members as of 5/19/2015

3.) Henry Beasley - ATU Presidential candidate's personal FB Blog - 561 Friends

It only take ONE to file liable lawsuit.

Statute of Limitations is EIGHT years.

"Collectively known as defamation, libel and slander are civil wrongs that harm a reputation; decrease respect regard, or confidence; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against an individual or entity. The injury to one's good name or reputation is affected through written or spoken words or visual images. The laws governing these torts are identical.

To recover in a libel or slander suit, the plaintiff must show evidence of four elements: that the defendant conveyed a defamatory message; that the material was published, meaning that it was conveyed to someone other than the plaintiff; that the plaintiff could be identified as the person referred to in the defamatory material; and that the plaintiff suffered some injury to his or her reputation as a result of the communication.

To prove that the material was defamatory, the plaintiff must show that at least one other person who saw or heard it understood it as having defamatory meaning. It is necessary to show not that all who heard or read the statement understood it to be defamatory, but only that one person other than the plaintiff did so. Therefore, even if the defendant contends that the communication was a joke, if one person other than the plaintiff took it seriously, the communication is considered defamatory."

In the meantime, you three might wanna get your heads together and figure out how you're gonna prove my mental condition to a Judge or even your own defense team! 

DEFAMATION VS LIBEL, BEASLEY, KERR, MARGULIES

Originally published May 24, 2015 at 2PM 


Libel is any Defamation that can be seen, such as a writing, printing, effigy, movie, or statue. 

Click images for zoom...

Not sure how many views he gets these days but the most recent number I found was 6178,  from a 7 day period in February 24, 2013. The Blog tends to incite members of the public, community and Trimet riders / employees against his victims.  Additionally, he reblogs many of these articles to his Facebook and twitter accounts which triggers interest from folks who would otherwise not be aware of it.

Never met her!

Captured from a Union only FB site which shows 773 ATU members/co-workers, as of May 19, 2015.

Update - as of August 31, 2015 this posting remains on up Beasley's Facebook

As of today - 3 DIFFERENT  people - 3 IDENTICAL comments!  

"QUEEN OF CRAZY"

1.) Rantings Blog - 6178 as of 2/24/13.

2.) ATU 757 specific FB Blog - 773 members as of 5/19/2015

3.) Henry Beasley - ATU Presidential candidate's specific FB Blog - 561 Friends

Additionally, three  members approached me volunteering to testify against Henry should I decide to pursue this in the court system. All of them said, when asked what his problem was with me, "She's crazy"!!  One of 'em said he kept repeating it, in front of others.  Henry appears to base his opinions of others with Margules' opinion. In my experience, Beasley appears to want to 'fit in', not develop his own experiences with others. Not a free thinker.  

BEASLEY'S involvement is troubling but not any more so than Christopher Raphael Days'.

They're BOTH running for one of the 3 top Union positions.

Day's running for Vice President.

Beasley's running for President.

Day files Preferring of Charges (Blackballing members) as fast as he can.  He even filed 'em against Dan Martin, one of his VP competitors and President Bruce Hansen.  'If you can't wow 'em with a principled intelligent campaign then blackball 'em the hell out of yer way!'  

Henry Beasley signed the petitions for Day, then went through this incredible disappearing act when members asked him Y or N did you sign it?!!  In the end, a day later he finally fessed up after the heat was on!

If you can't negotiate your personal problems with someone other than by attempting to blackball them out of the Union, then you can't negotiate. Probably not a good choice for office. 

Besides the Preferring of Charges, Beasley and Day support and  campaign on a site that allows the degradation of women.

"Collectively known as defamation, libel and slander are civil wrongs that harm a reputation; decrease respect regard, or confidence; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against an individual or entity. The injury to one's good name or reputation is affected through written or spoken words or visual images. The laws governing these torts are identical.

To recover in a libel or slander suit, the plaintiff must show evidence of four elements: that the defendant conveyed a defamatory message; that the material was published, meaning that it was conveyed to someone other than the plaintiff; that the plaintiff could be identified as the person referred to in the defamatory material; and that the plaintiff suffered some injury to his or her reputation as a result of the communication.

To prove that the material was defamatory, the plaintiff must show that at least one other person who saw or heard it understood it as having defamatory meaning. It is necessary to show not that all who heard or read the statement understood it to be defamatory, but only that one person other than the plaintiff did so. Therefore, even if the defendant contends that the communication was a joke, if one person other than the plaintiff took it seriously, the communication is considered defamatory."

NEIL'S NOTES, "THROUGH TRAGEDY, WE ARE A BETTER TRIMET"

Originally published 4/24/2015

Neil McFarlane

General Manager

$229,000.00 current salary

$12.8 thousand per month for life when he retiires

$165,000.00 cash the day he leaves.

According to The Oregonian

Click image for zoom

REALLY??!!!

NOT THE EQUIPMENT I OPERATE,

NOT MY EXPERIENCE!

OLD OR NEW!

After the lawsuit settlement - same shtick!

2500 series - 5 years ago. Same series Bus that was in the accident that night.

I'm 5'1", same height as Sandi Day. This picture is from my line of sight, what I see making a left turn. The barricade and clam shell mirrors prevent me from rockin' and rollin'' around the area for safe clearance.

Series 3100

One year old

As the bus maneuvers it's turn, the area between the right side edge of the clam shell 

closes with the left side of the barrier.

18 solid inches of blind spot

glare

glare

glare

headlights

Headlights - 30 to 50' area in front of the bus which is dark, then two little cubes of light smushed together.  Should've had the picture taken in an area that more accurately simulates the problem.  

In 2002, 18 years earlier, I filed similar concerns with Fred Hansen's Administration about my inability as a 5'1" Operator to safely make left turns after nearly running over a pedestrian. I couldn't see past the tall fare boxes and left side clam shell mirrors. The tall fare boxes continue to exist in the 1600's. The newest Operators with the least experience drive those buses during the busiest hours of the day! The seats were on the floor and I was driving Buses like that around the streets of Portland with less than 50% visibility. Rockin' n Rollin' in the seat wasn't an option then and today, even in the newest of the fleet.. You can't see. We took it to HR as I was asking for a special accommodation disability for Buses that would have me sitting up higher then the equipment. It was refused, because being short is not a legal disability. It's like what we do - transport people around the city in 20 ton vehicles and the cubicle people who make the rules are not on the same page. We, the Operators are all about safety, obviously we don't want to hurt or kill anyone or 'see' an accident, then get charged for it when we're not at fault. But the Agency doesn't care because 'proactive' isn't cost effective. Trimet is about statistics and policies. Not Safety. 'Safety' is a word Marketing uses. Always has been since I started 22 years ago. It's frustrating because no one is willing to make change. We thought Sandi Day's accident would but they instead gave us worse equipment then the one she had that night. There were times when I just wanted to get in Hansen's face, grab him by his lapels and yell as loud as I could,

"with all due respect...  but...

WHY IN THE HELL DON'T YOU WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!"  

He knew because the HR person Carol Jolly informed him and everyone else she could find on down the chain. Although Hansen was a thousand times more receptive and accessible to Operators than McFarlane, it's as if their 'humanity' is missing. 

Trimet continues to encourage cyclists to run out the back door to retrieve their

bike from the front of the Bus.

Rear door

With noise from outside and within, which includes traffic, fans, passengers, cell phones, children, typical Operator distractions such as driving, answering questions, collecting fare, talking to dispatch etc there's never an absolute we'll hear a cyclists alert from back there. Couple years ago as I was accelerating back in traffic a cyclist suddenly appeared on the rack. He jumped up there to avoid being hit by the Bus. He wanted his bike. I wanted my heart to calm down and my body to stop shaking.  I was required to continue driving. Nothing's changed in how Trimet deals with us after an adrenaline hit. I was even mandated to a meeting with my Assistant Manager because I slammed the brakes, the horn and yelled at a cyclist who suddenly rode off the sidewalk in front of my bus as I was moving out in traffic from Center Street. Poulson said I was not to react. I told him if he didn't want us to react then he should hire robots not humans.  

These issues were called to their attention 3 times.  All 3 times they've ignored the

danger. Why? Because the folks who make safety related decisions for the Agency don't understand the nature of our jobs and they either don't live in a pro-active world or are told not to. I filed a Request for Safety #389407. They didn't respond for 2 years, then only at my urging. The RSA was quite literally changed from my original concern/request which was to put a 12 x 12 Trimet Green sticker centered on the back door window stating:

CYCLISTS
FRONT DOOR ONLY

They wouldn't do it. Through an e-mail reply they instead chose to placate me by saying they created business card handouts with suggestions to cyclists, then stated the Station Agents completed the task of putting the handouts in the pouches. The handouts actually never came to fruition. It wasn't until I asked to see one that they realised I knew they didn't exist. They trashed the RSA.

The overlying factor's may be because 

Harry Saporta

Executive Director of Safety and Security

$157,940.94 per 2013 W2

... doesn't ride a bike on Trimet nor has he ever driven a Bus in revenue service or for that matter ever been seen riding on one. He comes to us without perspective. 

Well here's someone who knows something about bike safety...

Simply put, Trimet does NOT provide their front line workers with the proper tools to do their jobs as safely as they've been telling the community for years. 'Tools' includes Buses and all the equipment attached to it.

THREE YEARS LATER THE ATU STEP III PROCESS FINALLY HAPPENS

STEP III GRIEVANCE

Before I was willing to finish this series, I was waiting for the Union Step lll hearing and arbitration request to finish. IT TOOK THREE YEARS. It was finally heard last month, October 20th. The outcome of that meeting and request for arbitration is not a secret since I talked about it in the previous posting.  I found the process, how you're treated by Trimet for speaking out, fighting back and filing grievances a total scam, corrupted and demeaning to the human spirit. The next post will be about the hearing I attended at the Union office to ask for arbitration.

Some of you might want to take note of her new employer.  

Well...  looks like she's movin on faster then one can check out her resume.

Three years ago, Al Margulies and John Olsen (re: Chris Day) wrote me up to HR. Not together but separately. HR's Peggy Callahan chose to put the writeups together. I wrote about the INTERVIEW , investigative process and the reprimands I received as a result, on a regular continuing basis throughout this site, throughout the years.

WHY? BECAUSE IT WAS MY LIFE, MY EXPERIENCE, MY VOICE, AND I WANTED TO CREATE AS MUCH ATTENTION TO THE PROBLEM AS I COULD SO WHAT HAPPENED TO ME WOULDN'T EVER HAPPEN AGAIN TO ANOTHER PERSON! 

Amazingly enough,  every time I wrote about my experiences Margulies came back (example below) and kept trying to silence me.

He was bullying and harassing me all the while preaching from a pulpit which stood directly in front of a flag of the United State of America proclaiming Freedom of Speech!

Mr. Transparency

Nevertheless, this hasn't been about him for years because he is who he is and does what he does. No one can change him or anyone else's behavior except employers with policies who are willing to enforce them and lawmakers who are willing to make laws to stop Cyber Stalking in Oregon, that can and will protect us from perpetrators such as Margulies and his followers. The solution lies within protecting your employees not manipulating the system for or against someone because of personality  and or Diversity issues. The situation with me ended up evolving into a different but just as concerning problem with Trimet's HR department. Their lack of enforcement of their own policies can break a Respectful Workplace. They manipulate the system which makes them just as guilty of Bullying and Mobbing their own workers instead of protecting everyone equally and equitably - as promised.

I read a post on a Facebook Union only site about an experience another co-worker had with HR. He is being bullied and harassed by a known perpetrator, someone with a history of abusing co-workers - similar to my experiences, although more so through the abusers position of authority and not publicly as I was abused initially. HR blamed him for being part of the problem. What they do, as I found out is use the pain, discomfort, threats the other party is using as a weapon against you and utilize those same methods against you to get you out of their hair. They treat you like you're a non-person - someone not to be believed or tolerated.

Having said that, Callahan accused me of being the problem, protected my perpetrators Margulies and Olsen from HR policies - the same policies she used against Margulies in protecting other co-worker victims from him. She mandated me to a meeting, refused to tell me what I was accused of, threatened to terminate me if I didn't remove something from my Blog but wouldn't tell me what it was.  She beat me up so badly I wasn't 'fit' by their own standards to safely Operate a Bus - SOP 584. They refused to accommodate my disability then sent me to Garage Manager Evelyn Warren who expected me to drive because, "we don't have any operators to cover your run". Callahan destroyed my time-slip for the meeting which put me time-loss, then told Leonard Lamberth to sign the reprimands WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE AS TO WHAT THEY WERE ABOUT. Ain't that somethin!

All of it GRIEVANCE WORTHY!  I filed several of 'em for giving me reprimands against my First Amendment, my Constitutionally protected rights to write this blog,  and Fair use Laws which protect my right to remove and publish images from the internet.

They covered the 3 year time span as the retaliatory treatment against me from Management continued.  I was (investigated) after being told I was 'charged' with Insubordination. (from Mark Poulson),  Blindsided by an outside attorney they hired to silence this blog,  Warnings and accusations of running a red light, honking the Bus horn inappropriately and disrespectful conduct against a co-worker - each of them mandated meetings after which they destroyed my time-slips - again and again. I also filed a Grievance against the reprimand I received for the John Olsen write-up. In all,  he's written me up to HR 13 or 14 times, signed 4 and promoted 4 petitions to have me blackballed from ATU,  and to boot - I've never had a conversation with him. "Ain't that somethin!

There was a time-line of events - each covered through three inches of documentation:  

Trimet protected a co-worker from Al by giving him a 'warning' for posting a Constitutionally protected free-airway dispatch tape of an incident she had in her Bus. Conversely,  they gave me 'reprimands' for defending myself from his attacks which were in direct violation of HR 166, 171 and 202. - everything he did against me was against HR Policies but remained uninvestigated, unsubstantiated. Not the first time they've done it.  

They pick and choose which employees are worthy of protecting and which aren't then use one against the other. In other words, they protected Monica Fairicy from Margulies even though what he posted about her was perfectly legal and not against policy. Then they used him to go after me having full knowledge that his actions against me on his Blog were not only in full violation of policies but morally reprehensible. HR and Management actions are the same tactics commonly used in Workplace MOBBING.  

THE STEP III PROCESS

A Step III includes, on the Union side two Executive Board members as Judges and my garage E-Board Representative. On Trimet's side, two Managers and one Manager moderator.  The Union side is coming from the premise of what affects one effects all. If the vote is split you gotta ask the Union to arbitrate.  An arbitration costs $5,000. You go there because some part of the working and wage agreement was violated.  In this situation it was 'working conditions' specifically my Constitutionally protected Freedom of Speech and Internet fair use laws. I was given reprimands because of what I wrote and images I published on my personal Blog which were in defense of myself since employer Trimet refused to enforce the same policies they used to protect my perpetrator from me and other co-workers from him. In fact, at one point they BLINDSIDED me with an outside lawyer who they paid over $5600.00 to investigate my Blog, just to tell them if 'fair use' laws really existed.  Mind you, Trimet is filled with salaried lawyers - all of which are versed in Constitutional Law which is required curriculum. The reality is that Trimet blindsided me with the lawyer in an attempt to silence me.

STEP III

3 inches

In the hearing I had a document to support every accusation made against me. I knew which document and where it was located.  I was organized and ready.

Step III Moderator:



Evelyn Warren, Garage Manager Center Street
$$87,628.06
(W2 for 2013)

Evelyn Warren was tied to my case from it's inception. A confidential exchange in documents revealed she had a part in every step of the HR process including the reprimands.  She arranged for Callahan to meet with me DURING my sign-up. She ignored safety by refusing to accommodate my disability after the interview, she didn't do or order a 'fit test' prior to telling me I "had to drive" after the beating from Callahan "cause there weren't any Operators to take my place." She protected and Mobbed (“bullying on steroids,” a horrifying new trend whereby a bully enlists co-workers to collude in a relentless campaign of psychological terror against a hapless target.")  Assistant Manager Leonard Lamberth before and after he handed me the reprimands which he admitted he didn't know what they were about.  She was copied on to virtually every e-mail and letter which addressed the situation. She had a hand in the writing of the letter of findings from Callahan. She judged the Step ll. She should have recused herself from attending as her presence created a serious conflict of interest to the integrity of the hearing and she openly and relentlessly created a distraction by Mobbing recently hired Assistant Manager Joanne Kirkbride. 

Whenever I talked she engaged Kirkbride into conversations. At one point I asked that they listen and she shot back just as snotty as one could, "She asked me a question!" Warren was purposely distracting her, mobbing her to her side. The legal system uses the phrase 'witness tampering'. Same thing only she was doing it openly in the meeting without caring who heard her. Kirbbride sat there smiling, appearing somewhat embarrassed but I don't know. Trimet picks certain personality types for those positions and shyness and embarrassment isn't on the list. But feigning those traits could be. She was fairly new - perhaps just checking things out. 

When I brought up different points to my case, Evelyn shot back, "That's not true.", "you're lying." She tried to make a liar out of me throughout the meeting. I presented documents from Trimet Managers on virtually every level of the company to prove each statement I made. When I talked about my sending Leonard Lamberth my personal notes and links via e-mail so as to familiarize him with the case prior to the reprimand meeting and then his sending those notes on to his daughter (who doesn't and never did work for Trimet),  Evelyn again stated it wasn't true, calling me a liar again, my Union Rep corrected her by reminding her that she was there and "YES - it was true. He did say it!"

On yet another issue where her Ass't Manager Lilia Montoya accused me of running a red light, couldn't prove it then accused me of inappropriately honking the Bus horn, downtown and in Gresham then she threw my 2 1/2 hr time slip away giving me time-loss for the mandated meeting. Warren then claimed that I "yelled' at another Operator in Gresham which wasn't true. She actually produced 'another' incident report supposedly from yet an additional Operator but refused to show it to us or tell us who it was. It was an incident report that just suddenly appeared. She then agreed to just "forget it".  ***Update.  It was later revealed by Union Rep Guingerich that Alfonso Clemments (Powell Op) wrote it.  He apparently has the reputation of writing anyone up that Evelyn Warren asks him to. He was my leader on this run. He was having a hard time with the schedule and reroutes. 3 days out of 5, I took the lead and ran his and my runs. I was pretty shocked to learn this about him. I was also shocked to learn that he had a difficult time with my race, culture and religion. This all from someone I've never had a personal conversation with. 

When the John Olsen reprimands came up I handed out proof where he wrote me up to HR over 13 times.

Evelyn challenged me again, "Ya, but how many times did you write him up?" 
Me, "Never."  
Evelyn, "That's not true, you wrote him up." 
Me, "No."
Evelyn, "Not even once?" 
Me, "Not even once!"  

All she had to do was make a quick call to HR or look at my or his file. She came to the meeting unprepared and accusatory. 

Judge:

Jay Jackson
Manager Field Operations
$98,234.71 (W2 for 2013)

Jackson arrived at the meeting with his Laptop. He sat directly in front of me with it open. It was quite large! He was deeply involved with it - appeared to be reading something.  I asked if he was being paid 'overtime'   Everyone laughed but I was serious. Either you're here or you're there! It was clear, he wasn't interested or focused. Just a body in a chair doing something else, his mind somewhere else. Insulting to the process, to me and the people (public) he works for. 


Judge:

Joanne Kirkbride
Assistant Manager Powell
7 months at Trimet

When she's worked a full year her salary will be similar to
Mark Poulson's, which was
$68,211.59 (W-2 for 2013)

She sat in-between Evelyn and Jay.

***

The Grievances were about abuse in the workplace.

When I looked across the table this is what I visualized.

That I was being judged but not heard.

Unless you're a victim of abuse or you've worked with abuse victims you wouldn't understand and would probably be wondering what it was that the person sitting across from you did to deserve what she got.  

Unless you're an abuser yourself!

My Rep and I went outside the meeting room while they deliberated. At one point my Rep suddenly got up and went into another room.  She came back and said Evelyn had called Shelly Lomax, Executive Director Transportation and Barry Chapman, HR Business Partner to come down to assist in the deliberations. Highly unusual! It was all very sudden and curious. In the meantime one of the Union Judges came out and said to me, "Evelyn's attacks against you were very personal. It was obvious. Do you know that?" Me, "I know."

They got out of being responsible for the reprimands by saying they were given by HR, as a result cannot be grieved.  But the reprimands weren't given to me by HR. They were given to me by Leonard Lamberth:

Then, of course REALITY:  the politics of the agency:

The Grievance hearings are a facade meant to comply with the ATU contract. Trimet Managers have no say or power over these hearings. They are told in advance how to vote. Those Managers who comply against a target are assured continued employment.  

THE VOTE:

Two union judges voted the reprimands be removed from my file.

and the two Company judges voted they stay.  

Next step, ask the Union to arbitrate.

The next posting will deal with John Olsen. The one following will be

my request for Union arbitration. 

DID ANYONE CLAIM THE MONEY? (arbitration request)

Sheesh!

I was told by my Union Rep that my request to the Executive Board for Arbitration was voted down because:

My Rep, "Someone said you called them names too and they said they have proof."
Me, "Who?
My Rep, "I don't remember."
Me, "What proof?"
My Rep, "They didn't bring it."

Did the meeting have secrecy issues?  Because the thing is the votes in those meetings are NOT secret ballot. Was she protecting them or was she protecting a Union 'brother', a co-member of the Executive Board BEFORE she'd protect just a regular 'ol run of the mill member?!! Apparently there's a hierarchy in Unions too.

I then offered $300.00 to anyone  previous post  who could prove I called Margulies (while he was working for Trimet) or any member, executive board or other,  names.  I didn't have to give a dime to anyone. WHY?  'Cause no one could prove it! WHY? 'Cause it wasn't true. I NEVER lowered my standards to name calling but I sure as the hell am now.  The problem with this specific Executive Board member speaking out like that is he used his position as an Union Executive Board Member to inappropriately lie and sway the vote against me.  So....  this is not over...

Some of the executive board members I've talked with since tell me a different story.  More on that later...

UPPING REWARD TO $300.00 CASH

No one jumped at my offer to give them a hundred bucks to prove their claim that I deserved the reprimands I received for allegedly calling All Margulies names. Violations of HR 171 and HR 202. 

I brought documents proving my defense. They weren't interested. 

They said they had proof of their own but wouldn't show it in the meeting. They made no attempt to show it through my e-mail or through comments on this posting. Either they don't have it or one hundred dollars wasn't enough.  I know what I write. I'm not into lowering myself through name calling, at least not yet. My Blog postings regarding Margulies has always been my voice from the abuse, my journey and educational material about Cyber Stalking such as how to identify it, protect yourself and typical character traits of the abuser/s.  

Soooo

I'M UPPING IT TO $300.00 CASH

Put your proof where your mouth is!

A MESSAGE TO JOE RUFFIN, MARY LONGORIA, JON HUNT, and the rest of the EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS

Originally published 10/20/2014

I WILL GIVE A HUNDRED DOLLAR BILL TO ANY MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD WHO WAS PRESENT IN THE OCTOBER 20TH MEETING THAT CAN PRODUCE ANYTHING IN THE FORM OF AN:

a.) INTERNET SCREEN SHOT/S TAKEN FROM MY BLOG.

b.) DOCUMENT/S IN WRITING FROM ME.

WHERE I AM USING NAME-CALLING TACTICS AGAINST AL MARGULIES, WHILE HE WAS EMPLOYED AT TRIMET.

I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT WORDS LIKE 'REDNECK' OR 'DUMB AND DUMBER'.

I'M TALKING ABOUT SERIOUS NAME CALLING, SERIOUS AND SIMILAR WORDS TO WHAT HE CALLED ME FOR YEARS, PROFANE DEROGATORY SLANDEROUS DISPARAGING WORDS. SIMILAR TO WHAT

HE USED TO INCITE CO-WORKERS, HIS FRIENDS, FOLLOWERS, UNKNOWN STRANGERS SITTING BEHIND COMPUTERS,  CUSTOMERS, ANYONE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF TRIMET, AGAINST ME. WORDS COMPARABLE TO THE ONES HE CALLED ME ON HIS BLOG TO PUBLICLY HUMILIATE ME.  

OR ANYTHING ELSE PUBLISHED BY ME THAT VIOLATES HR 171 AND/OR  HR 202 (including images of co-workers obtained from any source other than the internet.)

PRODUCE IT , AS YOU SAY YOU CAN, AND I'LL GIVE YOU

A HUNDRED BUCKS!  

This btw did not involve ALL of the E-Board members, just the pro-Heintzman ones. Will someone please tell them he did not win the election nor is he working there anymore and it would be for the betterment of the membership if they would get their priorities in order and back the guy that did.