HMMM...THE LIST IS GROWING...PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HENRY BEASLEY - ADDED TO THE LIST.UPDATED AS OF JUNE 10, 2016

Libel is any Defamation which can be seen, such as a writing, printing, effigy, movie, or statue. 

Click images for zoom...

Not sure how many views he gets these days but the most recent number I found was 6178,  from a 7 day period in February 24, 2013. Margulies' Blog incites the public, the community and Trimet employees against his victims or targets.

btw, I've never met her!

Captured from a Union FB site which shows 773 ATU members/co-workers, as of May 19, 2015

As of May 24th, 2015  - 3 DIFFERENT  people - 3 IDENTICAL comments!  

"QUEEN OF CRAZY"

1.) Rantings Blog - 6178 as of 2/24/13.

2.) ATU 757 specific FB Blog - 773 members as of 5/19/2015

3.) Henry Beasley - ATU Presidential candidate's personal FB Blog - 561 Friends

It only take ONE to file liable lawsuit.

Statute of Limitations is EIGHT years.

"Collectively known as defamation, libel and slander are civil wrongs that harm a reputation; decrease respect regard, or confidence; or induces disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against an individual or entity. The injury to one's good name or reputation is affected through written or spoken words or visual images. The laws governing these torts are identical.

To recover in a libel or slander suit, the plaintiff must show evidence of four elements: that the defendant conveyed a defamatory message; that the material was published, meaning that it was conveyed to someone other than the plaintiff; that the plaintiff could be identified as the person referred to in the defamatory material; and that the plaintiff suffered some injury to his or her reputation as a result of the communication.

To prove that the material was defamatory, the plaintiff must show that at least one other person who saw or heard it understood it as having defamatory meaning. It is necessary to show not that all who heard or read the statement understood it to be defamatory, but only that one person other than the plaintiff did so. Therefore, even if the defendant contends that the communication was a joke, if one person other than the plaintiff took it seriously, the communication is considered defamatory."

In the meantime, you three might wanna get your heads together and figure out how you're gonna prove my mental condition to a Judge or even your own defense team!